問題說明
近期一臺主機報以下 kernel 信息:
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2269 tcp_mark_head_lost+0x113/0x290()
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: Modules linked in: iptable_filter ip_tables binfmt_misc cdc_ether usbnet mii xt_multiport dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod intel_powerclamp coretemp intel_rapl iosf_mbi kvm_intel kvm irqbypass crc32_p
clmul ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper cryptd ipmi_ssif ipmi_devintf ipmi_si mei_me pcspkr iTCO_wdt mxm_wmi iTCO_vendor_support dcdbas mei sg sb_edac edac_core ipmi_msghandler shpchp lpc_ich wmi acpi_p
ower_meter xfs libcrc32c sd_mod crc_t10dif crct10dif_generic mgag200 drm_kms_helper crct10dif_pclmul crct10dif_common syscopyarea crc32c_intel sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops igb ttm ptp drm ahci pps_core libahci dca i2c_algo_bit libat
a megaraid_sas i2c_core fjes [last unloaded: ip_tables]
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: CPU: 10 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Tainted: G W ------------ 3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64 #1
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R630/02C2CP, BIOS 2.3.4 11/08/2016
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: 0000000000000000 dd79fe633eacd853 ffff88103e743880 ffffffff81686ac3
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: ffff88103e7438b8 ffffffff81085cb0 ffff8806d5c57800 ffff88010a4e6c80
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: 0000000000000001 00000000f90e778c 0000000000000001 ffff88103e7438c8
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: Call Trace:
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: <IRQ> [<ffffffff81686ac3>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff81085cb0>] warn_slowpath_common+0x70/0xb0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff81085dfa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815c3663>] tcp_mark_head_lost+0x113/0x290
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815c3f47>] tcp_update_scoreboard+0x67/0x80
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815c964d>] tcp_fastretrans_alert+0x6dd/0xb50
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815ca49d>] tcp_ack+0x8dd/0x12e0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815cb3a8>] tcp_rcv_established+0x118/0x760
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815d5f8a>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x10a/0x340
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff812a84c6>] ? security_sock_rcv_skb+0x16/0x20
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815d76d9>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x799/0x9a0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffffa0140036>] ? iptable_filter_hook+0x36/0x80 [iptable_filter]
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815b1094>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xb4/0x1f0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815b1379>] ip_local_deliver+0x59/0xd0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815b0fe0>] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x350/0x350
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815b0d1a>] ip_rcv_finish+0x8a/0x350
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815b16a6>] ip_rcv+0x2b6/0x410
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815700d2>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x582/0x800
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815dc694>] ? tcp4_gro_receive+0x134/0x1b0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff811dc861>] ? __slab_free+0x81/0x2f0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff81570368>] __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815703f0>] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x40/0xc0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff81571578>] napi_gro_receive+0xd8/0x130
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffffa018b237>] igb_clean_rx_irq+0x387/0x700 [igb]
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff8155e862>] ? skb_release_data+0xf2/0x140
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffffa018b933>] igb_poll+0x383/0x770 [igb]
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff815d3120>] ? tcp_write_timer_handler+0x200/0x200
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff81570c00>] net_rx_action+0x170/0x380
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff8108f63f>] __do_softirq+0xef/0x280
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff81698c1c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff8102d365>] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff8108f9d5>] irq_exit+0x115/0x120
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff816997b8>] do_IRQ+0x58/0xf0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff8168e86d>] common_interrupt+0x6d/0x6d
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: <EOI> [<ffffffff81514a22>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x52/0xc0
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff81514b69>] cpuidle_idle_call+0xd9/0x210
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff810350ee>] arch_cpu_idle+0xe/0x30
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff810e82a5>] cpu_startup_entry+0x245/0x290
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: [<ffffffff8104f07a>] start_secondary+0x1ba/0x230
Jul 8 10:47:42 cztest kernel: ---[ end trace 6bc65b0c591c1794 ]---
主機環(huán)境如下:
System | Dell Inc.; PowerEdge R620;
Platform | Linux
Kernel | Centos 3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64
Total Memory | 64G
處理說明
堆棧的打印過程類似于xfs 告警處理 , 大致的過程為內核開啟 sack, fack 功能后, 網(wǎng)絡傳輸過程中需要的快速重傳和選擇性重傳會通過 tcp_input.c 文件的 tcp_mark_head_lost 函數(shù)進行處理, 其主要標記傳輸過程中丟失的報文的數(shù)量, 如下所示, 系統(tǒng)報的 kernel 堆棧信息由 tcp_mark_head_lost 函數(shù)中的 tcp_verify_left_out 函數(shù)調用觸發(fā):
// source/include/net/tcp.h
#define tcp_verify_left_out(tp) WARN_ON(tcp_left_out(tp) > tp->packets_out)
static inline unsigned int tcp_left_out(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
{
return tp->sacked_out + tp->lost_out;
}
// source/include/asm-generic/bug.h
#define __WARN() warn_slowpath_null(__FILE__, __LINE__)
#ifndef WARN_ON
#define WARN_ON(condition) ({ \
__WARN(); \
})
#endif
// source/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
/* Detect loss in event "A" above by marking head of queue up as lost.
* For FACK or non-SACK(Reno) senders, the first "packets" number of segments
* are considered lost. For RFC3517 SACK, a segment is considered lost if it
* has at least tp->reordering SACKed seqments above it; "packets" refers to
* the maximum SACKed segments to pass before reaching this limit.
*/
static void tcp_mark_head_lost(struct sock *sk, int packets, int mark_head)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
....
tcp_verify_left_out(tp); // trigger dump_stack
}
...
static void tcp_update_scoreboard(struct sock *sk, int fast_rexmit)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
if (tcp_is_reno(tp)) {
tcp_mark_head_lost(sk, 1, 1);
} else if (tcp_is_fack(tp)) {
int lost = tp->fackets_out - tp->reordering;
if (lost <= 0)
lost = 1;
tcp_mark_head_lost(sk, lost, 0);
} else {
int sacked_upto = tp->sacked_out - tp->reordering;
if (sacked_upto >= 0)
tcp_mark_head_lost(sk, sacked_upto, 0);
else if (fast_rexmit)
tcp_mark_head_lost(sk, 1, 1);
}
}
從 redhat-536483 中描述的來看, 這種錯誤信息一般是 tcp bug 引起的, 在內核使用已經(jīng)釋放的 tcp socket buffer 鏈表的時候就可能觸發(fā):
Root Cause
A use after free issue related to the TCP kernel socket buffer linked list. Thus it is a bug in the TCP kernel code. Although the bug is in TCP kernel code, but it could get triggered in multiple ways. It could get triggered due to NFS, or due to even an application(say java process).
處理方式
升級 kernel
如下所示, redhat 在 3.10.0-520 版本可能修復了 tcp_* 相關函數(shù)的 use after free 相關的 bug, 可以嘗試升級處理該問題:
centos 7.x changelog
* Thu Nov 03 2016 Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com> [3.10.0-520.el7]
- [net] tcp: fix use after free in tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue() (Mateusz Guzik) [1379531] {CVE-2016-6828}
關閉 fack/sack 功能
從紅帽知識庫的文檔來看, tcp_mark_head_lost 函數(shù)主要用來標記快速重傳和選擇確認的過程中丟失的報文數(shù)量, 所以或許可以臨時關閉 fack/sack 參數(shù)避免該問題的出現(xiàn):
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_fack=0
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_sack=0
可以優(yōu)先嘗試第二種方式, 如果還有問題再考慮升級 kernel 版本.
參考
redhat-536483
bug-1367091
cve-2016-6828
kernel-commit
總結
以上就是這篇文章的全部內容了，希望本文的內容對大家的學習或者工作具有一定的參考學習價值，謝謝大家對腳本之家的支持。
